A billionaire monk’s pledge to charity

Voices: You’ve publicly pledged to give 90 percent of your wealth to charity. Why?

Manoj Bhargava: Some people have hobbies that involve large personal consumption. I don’t have expensive hobbies. People ask me why I don’t own a second house, and I tell them I have enough problems with my first house. Why would I take on more headaches? So I really only have two choices. I can either do something for others, or I can wreck my son’s life. That doesn’t seem like much of a choice.

Voices: You lived on an ashram as a young man, and you’ve devoted many years of your life to meditation and other spiritual practices. How has this background shaped your approach to philanthropy?

Manoj Bhargava: On the personal side, my spiritual training taught me that excessive consumption can only harm you. The simpler your life is, the better off you are. The business and the work side is a lot more complicated. But I believe that if you have wealth, then you have a duty to go out and use it for the benefit of others. That probably also comes from my training.

Voices: What made you decide to become a businessman rather than a monk?

Manoj Bhargava: I still continue the same spiritual practice, so life hasn’t changed incredibly for me because the discipline is pretty much the same. And I found out I’m pretty good at business. For me, doing business and then giving money away is not so different from being a monk, because in both cases you’re working for others.

Voices: How did you figure out what you wanted to focus on as a philanthropist?

Manoj Bhargava: The most common mistake philanthropists make is failing to understand that it’s not about you. It’s about the customer. That’s pretty obvious in business: You have to look at the needs out there rather than sitting behind a desk and saying this is what we’re going to give them. Incredibly, a huge chunk of philanthropy isn’t about that. For example, Princeton University called me up and asked for money. I told them: “Look, I don’t want to waste your time but I don’t give money to the rich.” Putting my name on buildings is not my definition of philanthropy. I focus on human suffering, and you know suffering when you see it.

“If a guy is starving you don’t give him an education. First he has to eat otherwise he’s going to be dead.”

That’s how we do philanthropy, by going out into the field and finding out what people need. If a guy’s starving you don’t give him an education. First he has to eat; otherwise he’s going to be dead. Yet so much philanthropy is driven by fashion. Today’s fashion is sustainability. Who made that rule? It really is about customer need. If the guy needs food he needs food now. Whatever he needs, that’s what the goal should be, not sustainability.

Voices: How do you identify the projects that you fund?

Manoj Bhargava: The bottleneck is recruiting. Our approach is to adopt people who are doing a great job. Currently we’ve adopted between 350 and 400 charities. Through them, we affect the lives of about 400,000 people a year. Right now we’re building four hospitals in India. We’re funding school lunch programs, because in India there are tens of thousands of kids who only go to school because there’s a free lunch. We also fund programs that teach women how to take care of themselves in business.

Voices: The word “adopt” suggests a long-term commitment. Once you adopt these charities, are you tied to them for life?

Manoj Bhargava: It’s very simple. We check out each charity to see if they’re doing a good job. Then we adopt them or fund them. And then we check every year to make sure they’re not stealing the money. If they’re doing a decent job, we keep funding them. Three or four years from now we expect to have adopted about 800 charities.

Voices: What are some mistakes that you’ve made in philanthropy and what did they teach you?

Manoj Bhargava: Most of the mistakes that I’ve made in business and philanthropy have to do with hiring the wrong people. We’re charity wholesalers, so we need to find retailers who can go into the trenches and actually do the work. Sometimes we hire people who turn out to be about themselves, not the poor. Sometimes they turn out to be incompetent. I don’t know if I’m ever going to learn from those mistakes, because hiring is not a science. It’s still art. So the more people I meet, the more I’m going to mess up.

Interview by McKinsey&Company.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s